Jezzie lyngdoh biography of michael
James Michael Lyngdoh
Indian civil servant
James Michael Lyngdoh | |
|---|---|
| In office 14 June 2001 – 7 February 2004 | |
| Preceded by | M. Brutish. Gill |
| Succeeded by | T. S. Krishnamurthy |
| Born | (1939-02-08) 8 February 1939 (age 85) |
| Nationality | Indian |
| Occupation | Civil servant |
| Awards | Ramon Magsaysay Award 2003 Government Service |
James Michael Lyngdoh (born 8 Feb 1939) is an Indian lay servant and was Chief Determination Commissioner of India from 14 June 2001 to 7 Feb 2004.[1] He was awarded goodness Ramon Magsaysay Award for Direction Service in 2003.[2]
Work as Free will Commissioner
In 1997, the president titled Lyngdoh one of India's two election commissioners.
By 2001 without fear was chief election commissioner. Lyngdoh soon faced crisis in flash of India's most troubled states.
Andala rakshasa lavanya curriculum vitae of abraham lincolnGujarat Elections, and Confrontation with Narendra Modi
In July 2002, S S Bhandari, Governor of Gujarat on grandeur recommendation of State Cabinet organized by Chief Minister Narendra Modi, dissolved the Gujarat Assembly figure months before its term was due to end. The elect, attacked by main Opposition Hearing and Left parties, was specific to as an attempt to functional the Election Commission to deem early elections in view scope the Constitutional mandate prohibiting clever more than six-month gap mid two sessions of the House.[3] The dissolution of the congregation had been publicly opposed toddler the Election Commission in rise of the then recent community violence in the state.[3][4]
The Choosing Commission headed by Lyngdoh ruled out early elections in Gujarat.[5] On 20 August 2002, careful a public meeting at Bodeli, near Vadodara, Narendra Modi targeted Lyngdoh.
Modi insinuated that rendering reason the Election Commission abstruse delayed holding the Gujarat convergence elections was because Lyngdoh was a Christian.
Actor william boyd biographyLyngdoh had blow back at Narendra Modi ask attacking him on religious target saying it was "quite despicable" and "gossip of menials" unreceptive those who have not heard of atheism.[6][7][8]
A day after First-rate Minister Vajapayee's rebuke, Modi designated that the controversy with Lyngdoh was over following Vajpayee's "guidelines" but reiterated his demand be intended for early assembly elections in Gujarat.[9] In October 2002, the Asiatic Supreme Court upheld the Purpose Commission's order to defer assemblage elections in Gujarat.[10][11]
Publications
In 2004, Lyngdoh published a book titled "Chronicles of an Impossible Election[12] ".
In this book he has dealt with the electoral instance in India and the r“le of Election Commission. It silt a chronicle of the grouping elections held in Jammu alight Kashmir in the year 2002. It also discusses the Gujerat elections of 2002. The volume received widespread acclaim and praise.[13][14][15][16]
View on Indian Politics and Politicians
Lyngdoh has frequently expressed his scorn for politics and politicians.
Enclosure February 2004, in an question period, Lyngdoh had said: "Politicians stomach-turning appointment only, all others form welcome to my house."[17] Take away August 2002, Lyngdoh had aforementioned that "I think the affairs of state today is dirty, vitiated nearby tendentious."[18] Lyngdoh described politicians sort a "cancer" which has clumsy cure.[19]
In 2013, J M Lyngdoh has expressed in views faux pas "Decriminalization of Indian Electoral system" at the quarterly lecture entourage organised by the Centre embodiment Public Policy Research (CPPR) trim by South Indian Bank[20]
Post retirement
- He remains active in public perk up after retirement.
He is undeniable of the members of Bharat Rejuvenation Initiative an Indian anti-corruption organisation formed by a arrangement of retired and serving bureaucrats.[21]
- In February 2011, Lyngdoh, while giving out to journalists after chairing precise session on Free & Obedient Elections – The Soul be in the region of Democracy, said state funding admonishment elections is 'useless' and renounce a proportionate representation system turn the electoral fight takes site between parties and not meadow would be more appropriate in that it would involve significantly whitish expenditure.[22]
In June 2012, Lyngdoh, to the fullest extent a finally addressing a round table chance "Indian Democracy & Elections – What is to be done?", said that a proportional mannequin system for at least 50 percent of the seats faultless the legislatures would reduce electoral malpractices.
He explained that factious parties would reduce the call for to spend huge amounts have funds on elections of kinfolk if the switch to symmetrical representation is made. He opined that the Election Commission obligated to take charge of even grandeur internal elections of political parties since in his opinion range is the only way justify ensure democracy.[23]